TOPIC: Nigeria and
China Loans: Issues and Challenges
Date:
20th of May, 2020
Programme:
Business Morning on Channels Television.
Presenter:
Chimezie
Preamble
The
House of Representatives last week called for the review or outright
cancellation of latest China loan to Nigeria on the principle of force majeure.
The House is also to look into China- Nigeria loan agreement since the year
2000, with a view to ascertain their viability, regularizing and renegotiating
them. China is at the forefront of Africa’s debt drive, making the Asian nation
the largest bilateral creditor as it has given the continent loan worth about $152
billion dollars in 18 years; that is between the year 2000 and 2018. To avoid
unnecessary request for debt write-off, relieve or reprieve, the Chinese
government had limited its African loan to infrastructural development by
Chinese owned companies and in most cases Chinese neighbors. With such huge loans, lot of critics are concerned about how feasible it would be for
African nations to refund the credits, especially with the advent of the novel Corona
virus. Joining me is a Senior Lecturer and the Director, Centre for
Infrastructure and Policy regulation and Advancement at the Lagos Business
School, Dr. Bongo Adi. Our total external debt as at 2019 December was $27.7
billion dollars and the Chinese component is about $3.2 billion dollars. This
is less than 10%, is this really
something to worry about ?
A: Let’s get the data
clear. As it stands now, I think our total debt should be about 31 billion
dollars and if we add the new concessionary loan by the IMF and other
Development Finance Institutions, we should be looking at anything about 36
billion dollars. Now, regarding Chinese
loans, I think the Chinese Exim Bank since the year 2002 seems to have advanced
a total of $6. 5 billion dollars to Nigeria. So, that is quite significant. So,
if you said that is just about 10% and asking that if that is something to
worry about, I think we have to look at the total debt and our capacity to
repay. Because, it is not just about
China, but all our various creditors. When we look at it, debt independent revenue is about 95%, 96% actually. That has
passed the critical threshold. What it means is that we lack the ability. We do
not have the head room anymore. This mean that our independent revenue are
being stressed and strangulated by the enormous debt that is hanging over our
neck. So, increasing that Chinese loan is something that we really need to be
concerned about . Why is that so? We have to look at the history of Chinese
loan, not just in Nigeria, but in other African nations and in the entire
developing world. That has come up in the last three years from 2017. I know that the United States of
America has taken up the Chinese on this . The US Representative at a point
wrote to the President to intervene on what is called the Chines Debt Trap Diplomacy,
using Finance as a weapon in many developing countries. Thus, out of the 63
countries that is hosting Chinese Belt and Road initiative project, about
twenty of them had already gone under debt
distress and eight of them are about to lose their foreign debt sustainability
if they should take any further loan. If
that were to be a good guide, it means that we need to really be careful when
we are borrowing from China.
Q: Are you
concerned that Nigeria can find itself in the same situation as Zambia where
the Chinese government had to take over
some government assets?
A: That is it actually.
We have to look at what is happening in other African countries. It is not just
Zambia, we have Kenya, we have Elamo port in Kenya, that is about to fall into
the hands of the Chinese authorities. Also, we know about Djibouti which is a
small African country; more than 85% of their debt operation is in the hands of
Chinese and we know that Djibouti occupies a very strategic anchor pointt in
Africa in terms of shipping, so the Chinese in order not to leave anybody in
any doubt as to their intention has established a Military base there. So, we
have to put that into consideration. And, of course in Sri-lanka, we know what
happens to the Amba Toto International Airport. It has to go under lease to the
Chinese for 99 years, when the government found itself in default of increasing
Chinese loan they used to build that Airport. So, we’ve seen this repeating
cycle all over the world where the Chinese will advance infrastructural loans
without asking questions and these nations not critically censoring or
scrutinizing the Chinese intention and they kept up wrapping such loans until
they find themselves in default. And, what normally happen is that the Chinese
will begin to take possession and repossessing the Strategic infrastructure.
So, that is what some people call Chinese Chop stick
imperialism. We’ve seen that
and so many researchers are also covering that. We know about George Ayitte,
the Ghanaian who won the HMilkimh price in 2003 for his work . He has looked
extensively at Chinese engagement in Africa and the rest of the world and the
experience is not just pleasant.
Q: What would
you make of the move by the House of Representative calling for a review and
possibly debt relieve going by the reality that the Chinese has developed a strategy
of tying the loans to infrastructural projects?
A: That is the step.
That resonates with what I have said
about China and their interest in key strategic infrastructure in many emerging
countries of the world. So, if they are tying their loans to projects,; that
leaves nobody in any doubt of their intention , which means that if you are not
able to repay, they take possession of those infrastructural asset. That
becomes their collateral. Let’s make it clear. First of all, it is not bad to
borrow. The house is saying that we should declare force majeure so that we can
exonerate ourselves from repayment. We need to understand that Covid-19 is a
temporary setback that will go away one day. It would not be there forever, and when this happens, we find ourselves in a
situation where we will need to borrow money again. So, if we act base on this
to declare Force majeure and default on our loan. That would not be a good
thing to do, looking at the future. So, my thinking is that we have to introduce
accountability, transparency and responsibility in our engagement with the Chinese
when it comes to loans. We need the loan definitely, but we do not have the
right institutional structure to guaranteeing that when those loans are taken
they will be judiciously used and that we can repay them. There are so may solutions to all of these which I think we
need to be looking at.
Q: So far the
Abuja- Kaduna rail and a couple of others
have been successful but government seem to have suspended work on Lagos
– Ibadan Rail Project two months ago
because of the coronavirus pandemic , what impact would this have on Nigeria’s
debt to China ?.
A: When you said that
the Abuja –Kaduna rail has been successful, it depends on how you want to
qualify that success Yes, success in the sense that it has been completed and
executed. But , when it comes to the economics of that, questions are being
asked. I know that I have heard the Minister of Transportation in one forum talking
about how government subsidizes almost 60% of that. Giving that all over the
world, the cry is about government removing subsidy. Do you think
that those projects would be sustainable if those subsidies were removed and if that were the case, would
we be able to pay back some of the debts taken in executing some of those
projects. So, what is the impact of all of these? We need to be careful ,
that’s what I’m saying in terms of accountability, transparency and
responsibility. But, beyond that, before
even taking any loan, I think there are various options. Even PPP, we shouldn’t
be talking about PPP because even the World Bank has begun to change its stand
about PPP. They now begin to talk about blended Finance. Blended Finance
is a strategic tool where you bring in
development Finance with some philanthropic funds in order to activate private
capital investment into infrastructural development. I think there are some
solutions we have to be looking at so that we will know that we are doing the
right thing and not jeopardizing our own sovereignty.
Q: Okay, let’s
look at the Belt and Road Initiative, the hype around it seems to have
subsided, what do you think is responsible ?
A: Well countries are
still battling with Covid-19. So, we need to get ourselves out of the pandemic
that we found ourselves before talking about other things. Moreover, why nobody
is talking about it is not because that people have learned to live with it. It
is because China is also under stress. I listened to the Chinese Premier the
other day during the World Health Assembly;
people said he has been forced to actually address the world. In the characteristic of China, he made another
commitment of $2 billion dollars to support it, you know throwing money at all
these things . When China has been called out, they have this practice of
bringing out money. They are now facing so many questions about Covid-19 and
its management from Wuhan. I think at the end of the day, after we are through
with this, people will still be asking questions about Belt and Road
initiative. Like I said earlier, out of the about 63 countries housing the Belt
and Road initiative, 23 of them are in financial distress , not being able to
repay those debts. If that were to be a guide , you will see that the Belt and
Road initiative isn’t in the interest of the emerging economies.
Q: Looking at
the financial outlay of the Belt and Road initiative, it is in the region of $1 trillion dollars, is
this not ambitious on both sides?
A: Yes, you need to
understand what the Chinese intention is. Don’t look at the size of the loan;
you have to look at the intention behind the loan. What is the Chinese
strategic imperative? We are looking at a world, where China will begin to
emerge as a global power. In the past, we have more or less the UNIPOLAR World
dominated by the US. The Chinese has seen itself as an emerging power. Their
GDP in the next few years will surpass that of the United States, the second
largest economy in the world and in terms of their military power, they are
also coming up, challenging the established order. You should also understand
that Chinese became the manufacturing hub for
the whole world. And as a result, they needed the logistics to bring in
the raw materials; to bring in inputs for their production and also exporting all the finished products So, they need to
protect the routes. When, you become an economic power, the next thing is to
also become a political power. So, it is important for them to protect those routes.
So, the $1 trillion dollars being given
out under the Belt and Road initiative is not just a loan ;it is part of
the Chinese strategy of protecting their
dominance of the global economy right now .
Q: Overall, what
is your view about Nigeria’s debt sustainability?
A: As I said ealier, our
debt is high, independent government debt revenue available to service the loan runs at 96%, which means for every 1 naira,
96 kobo is used for debt service. So, what is left. That is a very critical
situation, that is a precarious situation for any nation to be. Should we
because of that stop borrowing money?. Like I said, we have very many smart people in Nigeria, we have very
smart experts even within government that
knows how to structure good deals, so, what is require is accountability,
responsibility and transparency. We have to move away quickly from the whole
thing about public -funded infrastructure, because government has demonstrated
the lack of capacity and competence in managing projects and making them work
and economically viable. There are so many solutions we have to explore. I have
talked about the blended finance. There are so many structural mechanism and
framework that we can put in to ensure
that we get the loans and put into good
projects that is able to repay by itself.
Culled from Channels Television...
No comments:
Post a Comment